Tuesday 3 December 2019

AS2885.3 FREE DOWNLOAD

Determine if a particular safety threat to a pipeline is credible. Help people to make decisions, and Help people to not make decisions. Code of Practice A code of practice is a set of rules which details how people in a certain industry should behave. In contrary, older pipelines, particularly those aged above 20 years, are not built with pigging facilities and in many cases are difficult to pig. That is, to address similar risks. as2885.3

Uploader: Nikorn
Date Added: 18 July 2018
File Size: 26.29 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 57094
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]





However, this hall of mirrors can lead to initially small issues propagating through qs2885.3 ecosystem. When helping people not make decisions, standards provide standard requirements, for example for design parameters. These are one type of standard.

AS Part 3 - Operations and Maintenance Training Session

Code of Practice A code of practice is a set of rules which details how people in a certain industry should behave. A diligent safety decision-making process involves,: Finally, look at the ad2885.3 of the residual risk as per the process set out in AS, the risk management standard, using a risk matrix provided in AS Australian Standard AS An Integrated approach to manage integrity of unpiggable gas pipelines using AS four element approach.

Before commencing construction, you must have a Safety Management Plan. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

That is, standards help people predict and manage the future — people such as engineers, designers, builders, and manufacturers.

In this manner, Standards Australia forms a self-referring ecosystem. This applies to any pipelines used to carry: Really appreciate this site as a heads up to any drafts for comment through Industry and would as28885.3 any members of ME involved with updates, revisions etc to keep us informed Peter Owbridge. There are good technical and business reasons for this approach; First, some quality assurance of content and minimising repetition of content, and Second, to keep intellectual property and revenue in-house.

as2885.3

In the AS process the decision is made when enough controls are in place that a specified target level of risk is no longer exceeded. However the combination of the self-referring standards ecosystem and the two types of standards leads to some perhaps unintended consequences.

as2885.3

There are good technical and business reasons for this approach. If the risk is not acceptable, apply more controls until it is and then move on with the project.

Australian Standard 2885, Pipeline Safety & Recognised Good Practice

The latter process is problematic when viewed in hindsight. Such decision-making processes are not exclusive to Australian Standards. Standards have a number of aims. They provide standardised decision-making processes for applications, including asset management, risk management, quality as885.3 and so on. One of the main goals of AS is the safe operation of pipelines containing gas or liquid petroleum; the draft AS The AS risk sign-off process does not adequately address this.

Australian Standard , Pipeline Safety & Recognised Good Practice | R2A Due Diligence Engineers

Is the risk decision-making element of AS recognised good practice? Determine if a particular safety threat ax2885.3 a pipeline is credible. In the WHS-based process, this decision is made when there are no further reasonable control options to implement. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. That is, to address similar risks.

In addition, the AS suite refers to dozens of other Australian Standards for specific matters. Below is the current status and planned activities this year for the Standards: Like many technical standards, AS provides extensive and detailed instruction on its subject matter. Noting the two types of standards above, these measures can be physical or process-based e. Standards fit within this due diligence process as examples of recognised good as2885.3.

as2885.3

No comments:

Post a Comment